Monday, May 27, 2013

In Review: "Epic"



In Review: "Epic"

The reason I am so hard on children's movies is because they matter the most. Children learn the most from what they experience around them. The combination of sights and sounds is a goldmine of knowledge. Our children are our future. We need to teach them how to be good citizens and take care of our dying world. That is why it frustrates me when Hollywood puts out shitty movies for the younger generation. They think, “They don’t know the difference between a good and bad movie so let’s just b.s. this one, guys. It’s only a kid’s movie.” I assure you these children will get more from these movies then any adult will get from an adult film.
 “Epic” is one of those “we don’t care” kid’s movies. The film has no point, little imagination, and a poor script. And as an adult, I was bored to tears. Not from the cheesy one-liners or slapstick humor, but from the ridiculously slow pace. This movie moved slower than the slugs in the film. And not even it’s star-studded cast could save it from rotting. 



The Plot

MK (aka Mary Katherine)(Amanda Seyfried) has just lost her mother to an unknown disease and must move out to…somewhere to live with her father (Jason Sudeikis) who got divorced (?) from her mother for his obsession with an advanced civilization of little people living in the forest around his house. MK is trying to connect with her father with no progress. One day she chases her three-legged dog into the forest. And she gets shrunk down to the size of a flower. Real Alice in Wonderland/Fern Gully stuff. The world her dad had tried to find is real and she must save it. The queen flower fairy Tara (Beyonce) has just died. She left behind a flower pod that must bloom in the moonlight that night or the forest will be overtaken by the Bowgens (Head one- Christopher Waltz) creatures- evil, dark fairies that want to kill the forest. (Seriously, Fern Gully much?) Some Leaf Men/tiny soldiers (Colin Farrell, Josh Hutcherson) come along to protect the pod and tiny MK, along with a slug (Aziz Ansari) and a snail (Chris O’Dowd from “Bridesmaids”). They meet the all-knowing caterpillar played by Steven Tyler. And of course they have to run into a toad version of Pitbull. Because that is so necessary. 



The Cast

Blue Sky (the makers of “Ice Age”) really pulled out the checkbook for this one. The names in this movie are huge-this being the first animated role for Beyonce and Steven Tyler. And some of them were able to bring great life to their animated characters- Aziz and O’Dowd especially. I kept picturing O’Dowd in a cop costume. And Tyler got to sing! Totally fun! But Beyonce was left out-WTF! She died too early on in the movie and she was probably the best character other than the hilarious slug and snail.


The Message

Everyone is connected? The battle of life and death in nature? Just because you haven’t seen something doesn’t make it's not real? Yeah… I got nothing. They threw a lot of messages at you, but none that really stuck. Because they didn’t have a good script, it just sounded like a lot of cheesy lines. 

Overall

This movie was so disappointing. Animated movies allow you to create worlds that no one has ever seen before. And I get overused nature stories of little people. Been there, done that. And the pace was like molasses. If I was a 5 year-old and had a 5 year-old’s attention span, I would not have been able to get through this 1.75 hour movie. And as an adult, there was no heart or laughter for me to care to watch. Blue Sky still has nothing on Disney or its runner-up, DreamWorks. It should just stop. It went too far with 4 Ice Age movies. They died out faster than the dinos.Don’t see this movie. Don’t torture your children or yourself. Wait until “Monsters University” comes out in June.


(It's the thing Beyonce Fairy is holding)

1 out of 4 Flower Pods- It's all for the slug and snail!

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

In Review: "The Great Gatsby"



"The Great Gatsby"

THERE ARE SPOILERS THROUGHOUT THIS REVIEW 
(Hopefully you have read the book- if not, you should because it's awesome!)

F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel is one of my all time favorite books. It is probably the only book I read cover to cover in high school. On top of that, Baz Luhrmann ("Romeo+Juliet" 1996 (also with Leo DiCaprio),  "Moulin Rouge" 2001) is one of my all time favorite directors. So it was hard to be objective going into this movie.

My last post was on "Beautiful Creatures" (2012), and I talked about how a great movie that is based on a book makes you want to read the book. Well, this movie is even better than the book. In my history of movie-watching (my whole 21 years of living), I have never seen a movie that outshone its book. Until now.

The Plot

If you were not forced to read the novel in high school- you have missed out first of all, and you really should read it- but I will tell you what happens.

Nick Carraway (Tobey Maguire) comes to New York hoping to have a quiet summer to learn about his new trade, bonds. But instead he gets sucked into the ecstasy around him. His cousin, Daisy Buchanan (Carey Mulligan), lives right across the lake from him. He visits her and her husband, Tom, (Joel Edgerton) and her best friend, Jordan Baker (Elizabeth Debicki). Nick lives next to a grand castle. Its  master never introduces himself but he is known as Jay Gatsby (Leonardo DiCaprio). 

Gatsby holds these fabulous parties every weekend including dancers, singers, performers, famous actors, senators, and all the most important people. But no one knows anything about him- just the rumors that have spread.

At the Buchanan residence, Tom is cheating on his wife with Myrtle Wilson (Isla Fisher), wife of a mechanic named George Wilson (Jason Clarke).

In this tale of romance, betrayal, secrets, and tons of alcoholic consumption, Nick learns the truth about Gatsby and the truth about the world around him.

The Cast


I was skeptical about having DiCaprio be Gatsby. I had always pictured Gatsby as this white-haired gentleman with a distant personality. But DiCaprio is able to bring the character right off the page and into a whole other understanding. All of the actors are. This book is mostly Nick's inner monologue so we don't get to see into the souls of any of the other characters. And Gatsby's is probably the hardest to understand. He is a man madly in love. To the point where he is obsessed with this vision of how he wants his life to be and how he wants his Daisy to be.

Nick is also able to be brought to life in this film. The film starts with Nick at a mental hospital after the events of his youth. Maguire shows how distraught the story of Gatsby has made him. He is transformed from our loyal narrator to the hero of our story, trying to figure out his past and how to move forward.

Mulligan also does an excellent job giving breath to the character of Daisy. She is also a character that is not 100% relatable. I still don't agree with her motives, but due to Mulligan's portrayal I finally understand that she never wanted to be moral or in love, she just wanted to be told what to do for the rest of her life. And get lots of money out of it. I always knew she was a gold digger, but now I can understand why.

The Message


Can you repeat the past? Or have people changed too much to be able to live how you always wanted to?

And what makes a man? Is it his money? How beautiful is wife is? What school he went to? Or how honest he is?

I have always been deeply in love with Gatsby. He is unfailingly loyal to a woman who does not deserve him. He is the hopeless romantic. He is like a child in so many ways- he gets nervous around Daisy; he is wary to trust someone new, but when he does trust them he will always tell them the truth. He is not perfect. He's an extreme perfectionist, so much so that he does not run away with Daisy to be with her. He wants his life just the way he has planned it, in a big house with every luxury and his beautiful wife Daisy. He continually says that he was "married" to Daisy the minute he kissed her. But I think he was in love with the idea of how his life would be with Daisy, not Daisy herself. In the end, his obsession and Daisy's cowardice kills him.

The story has many more themes running through it- nouveau rich vs. old money, the idea that someone (God or human) is always watching, the power of gossip, class issues, and much more. But the main, and to me the most important message, is you are defined by how you treat other people. Tom may own a beautiful house and have a beautiful wife but he still cheats on his wife who he never really loved and he indirectly kills Gatsby. He only cares about himself. Nick is not very wealthy, but he never reveals Tom's secret. He is also the only one to show up to Gatsby's funeral. He is able to forgive his faults, unlike everyone else. At the end of the day, Gatsby may have been crazy, but he would never hurt anyone. He could have had Tom taken care of many times to solve all of his problems, but he never does. He is truly a good man. 

There are always days in my life where I wish I could go back in time. I wish I could relive a moment or even a year knowing what I know now. But you cannot repeat the past. People are always changing. Time is a necessary part of life so that we can learn to let go and move on. But Gatsby can never let go (Ha! That must be a DiCaprio theme!- see "Titanic"). He is forever bound to this woman who is too afraid to love him. It is a beautifully tragic love story.

The best thing about Luhrmann is that he is able to transport you into his fantastical and extravagant world. The costumes are perfectly retro and modern at the same time. The sets are intricately designed to a tee- everything is done for a reason. I described the camera work and the staging of the film like dancing. Everything flows in movement to some unheard song, stringing every movement of the actors and of the camera together. The soundtrack stays with you for days after watching the movie (I HAD to buy the whole soundtrack the very next day). That is Luhrmann's style. He is a go big or go home kind of guy but not at the expense of a single detail.

What I loved most about this movie was how true it was to the classic book. The film uses the beautifully written words of Fitzgerald not only in the script but also by scribbling them on the screen, giving full credit to how well written the novel is. Most books-turned-movies just take the story and a few key lines from the author. But "Gatsby" treats those words as sacred windows into the story and the characters.

Overall


I have been working on this blog for days now. Not necessarily because I haven't been able to write, but because I couldn't find anything wrong with this movie. One could argue that it is too long. But if we are being fair to the work it is based on, the movie needs to be that long. You have sat through 3 hours of Lord of the Rings: "Return of the King." I promise you can do 2 and a half hours of Gatsby.

I have been recommending this movie to everyone. It is 100% worth seeing even if you are unfortunate enough not to have read the book. Seeing it in 3D is pretty cool too. There are several shots that sweep down the length of a skyscraper which are awesome to ride. But it's Baz. His world is spectacular enough that you don't need to spend the extra money. You just need to see the movie.

4 out of 4 Green Lights



Thursday, May 9, 2013

ReWatch: "Beautiful Creatures"

This movie is a recent release, but I was unable to review it on my blog. I had seen it before the inkling of having this blog. It is so wonderful that it deserves a shout out.

"Beautiful Creatures" (Feb. 2013)



A really good movie of a book makes you want to read the book.

When this book came out Twilight had had its day, and frankly, I was a little tired of the dark creature being in love with the human. I get it. It ends badly, but they are going to do it any way. Twilight mostly stinks because it's all brooding stares and constipation-like facial expressions. They are so pained at their tortured relationship that they can never be happy.

Boring. I'm never gonna have that. No matter how much I wish I had a vampire boyfriend, it's not going to happen. So why would I want to watch a 2 hour movie about it? And read a four book series?

Because this story does what no other supernatural romance has been able to do. It makes it relatable.

The Plot


Lena (Alice Englert) is a caster, aka a witch, who will be "claimed" by the dark magic or by the light magic on her 16th birthday. She comes to stay with her uncle Macon (Jeremy Irons) in Gatlin, South Carolina, a very rural, very conservative, very boring town. Our hero Ethan (Alden Ehrenreich) lives with his dad who he never sees and the housekeeper/family friend Amma (Viola Davis). Ethan longs to escape this retched town, his annoying, blond, uber conservative Christian girlfriend, and the fear that he will be stuck in this town for the rest of his life.

Then he meets mysterious Lena who everyone says is a devil worshipper, or something else horrible like that. Ethan could care less what anyone else thinks so he wanders into her life one day and can't seem to let go.

The film tells the story of their love, the secrets that are hidden from Lena about her past and about her all-powerful dark mother Sarafine (Emma Thompson). Which side will she be claimed for-the dark or the light?

The Message


SPOILERS!!!- The idea behind this movie is that you have a choice in your future. You are not claimed, but instead you get to decide your fate by what you do and who you love. As we have learned from rom-coms, love is not something you can control. But you can control what you do for the one you love. Too many times you have selfish lovers who can only think of the pain they will feel if they were to ever be separated. They do not realize the danger they are putting their love in. If only Romeo and Juliet could have figured that one out.

Overall


This movie is mostly told from Ethan's perspective, and he is not a brooding, depressed, or obsessive male. He is an actual person, not a superhero. He gets mad at Lena and yells at her. He cries. He hides his feelings. He tries to act tough. He's a real guy! Thank you, Kami Garcia and Margaret Stohl, for creating a realistic fiction male character.

Because Ethan is real, the relationship between Ethan and Lena is real. Lena just wants to be normal, and acts normal. She doesn't want Ethan to enter into her world or make him one of them. She wants to keep him safe, and she wants to live in his world. They go on awkward dates. They make fun of each other. They fight. They make up. They are a real couple, not just a fluffy copy of what we wish our romance lives could be.

That is why this movie is worth watching over and over again.

3 out of 4 Moons


Tuesday, May 7, 2013

In Review- "Iron Man 3"

Iron Man 3


I have never been a comic book nerd. I think the only exposure I got to the world of Marvel and DC Comics was from my dad's superhero action figures. I distinctly remember the Dr. X one, a bald guy in his wheelchair.

It wasn't until "The Avengers" that I started to fall in love with superhero movies. "The Avengers" (2012) is funny, well written, with excellently developed characters who are lovable and unforgettable. I have seen that movie far too many times for it to be out less than a year.

I was hoping this superhero flick, written and directed by the same guy who did "Lethal Weapon" (1987), would have the same affect "Avengers" had on me. Not so much.

It still has the same wonderful characters, and brilliant actors who play them, but the plot is lacking in suspense and surprise- some key factors in the "Avengers" (SPOILER- Like when we don't know if Tony is going to make it out of the wormhole).

This film is building from "Avengers". In that film we see Tony's heart, and not the glowing one that powers his metal suit. He risks his life for his friends and the rest of the world. When all through Iron Man and Iron Man 2, we have known him to be the selfish and a cold-hearted playboy. This is how you do superhero character development. Not by turning your hero into a douche bag (**cough* Sam Raimi, Spider-Man).

The Plot (SPOILERS AHEAD) 


This movie, as I have said, takes place right after "Avengers". The world is saved from near disaster and all is well. But is it? Tony has now acquired severe anxiety attacks and cannot sleep, causing him to produce 42 Iron Man suits. He is under a lot of pressure now, having saved the world and all.

In comes a new villain, a terrorist (as if we haven't had enough movies about them). He has these broadcasts nationwide about how he is going to kill the president and how America is awful and all that.

Flashback! (ouch that hurt) Tony is in 1999, almost 2000 (it's New Year's), and he meets a fine-looking female (Rebecca Hall) who has found a way to get plants to regenerate themselves (like Wolverine plants), but they tend to explode when they do that... not super useful. Then we have the nerd in the corner (Guy Pearce) who pushes himself into a crowded elevator to tell Tony about AIM (not the email service), some new science-related project. Tony gives him the slip, sleeps with the girl, and continues living.

Flashforward! Turns out these two supposedly random people were super important. Yay! Nerd dude wants to get with Pepper Potts and sell Stark industries his gadget that can control a human mind. Yeah, thanks but no thanks, now super sexy nerd. But can you believe it, he's the bad guy. This is what happens when people get rejected by Tony Stark. In fact, the guy playing the terrorist (The Mandarin- we're not really sure if he's Chinese, Japanese, Arabic, Afghani- maybe that was done on purpose?) is a stupid actor who is doing this all for drugs! The evil genius behind this all is super-hot-nerdy/reject guy who has transformed himself and a whole army of forgotten misfits into fire-breathing, self-healing monsters. He has used the good looking girl from the beginnings' research to make his monsters. And he has kidnapped Pepper and turned her into a monster too! And he has the president! In comes Iron Man to save the day and everything goes back to normal. He ends the movie by replacing his glowy heart for a real one and saying that he is retiring (?) but he is always Iron Man. It sounded like he was going to take a break from the superhero lifestyle at least for a while.

The Cast


Robert Downey Jr. is a genius and is and will always be Iron Man. I'm not going to talk about that. I am also not going to talk about how wonderful Gwyneth Paltrow is, even if she is barely in this movie. My favorite character in this film was a little kid of maybe 10. Ty Simpkins played the young boy who helps Tony realize how much of a superhero he is. He helps him fix his suit when it breaks. He helps him find the bad guys. This kid is the best sidekick ever. The two of them even have witty banter. It's adorable.

The Message


It's a superhero movie so I know how it is going to end. He is going to save the world and get the girl (that's how the good ones end anyway). But you didn't have to be that obvious. I knew the plot twist, if you can even call it that, early on in the movie. You knew these random characters from the beginning had to come back and you knew the reject guy always gets pissed off and returns with a vengeance (see "Green Lantern"- actually don't see it, unless you just want to watch it for Ryan Reynolds, then I can't judge you). And Pepper could not have died because she's the best superhero girlfriend ever. But please, give me something to hold my breath for!

This movie is all about Tony's character development. He becomes the good guy, the nice guy. He realizes that he is not superhuman, like he thought he was. He also realizes that he has a heart- not a physical one, a metaphorical one. He is deeply in love with Pepper Potts, and he will do anything to keep her safe. We watch him grow during this film and it is such a joy! Yes, he's still Tony Stark, but he's an even better Tony Stark.

Overall


It's like someone forgot about the plot. They paid so much attention to developing Tony's character that they forgot to close the curtain around the plot twist. So it was enjoyable to watch our fav character grow, but no fun to watch him fight a fake terrorist and a predictable dragon-man.

I have to say though, it was my favorite Iron Man. And as I have heard from various sources, Robert Downey Jr. says he will not be doing another "I.M." movie again. But that's ok. We will have you for "Avengers 2"!

2.5 out of 4 Hearts